Rebuttal

I haven't written in a while, so what better way to come back than with a bang! For those that are not aware, there's been much hoopla over the Dream Act recently especially with Pres. Obama's address in Texas this past week. In addition, there have been various demonstrations on college campuses nationwide including at the University of Indiana-Bloomington, where a group known as the Indiana 5 made headlines in the Latino Greek world due to the fact that 2 of the 5 members are brothers of Lambda Upsilon Lambda Fraternity. Not that I expect all LGLO members to be supportive of the actions of the members, or the bill in general, as everyone is entitled to their own opinions and beliefs, but one reaction really stirred me.

It was written by a member of an LGLO sorority, and while she does not mince her words about her personal views on the Dream Act, she does it at the expense of another organization. I embrace the fact that I can live in a country where there are a myriad of views and opinions, however, pushing your agenda by trivializing another group of people completely contradicts to the mission of your argument.

Now, if you are like most people reading this, you can’t criticize them, you’re white. However, according to some unwritten rule I can because I’m half-Hispanic, and I will tell you how just like a myriad of other culturally based greek organizations, they are a hotbed for far left activism and anti-American rhetoric. How do I know? I was the chapter president of a sorority just like it.

 "Anti-American rhetoric" and "far left activism" are part of LUL's agenda? I don't believe so. Yes, like many other LGLOs thier organization was created from a political stance of equality not race supremacy. We were all taught that the United States were founded by groups of people who wanted to free themselves from unjust situations (ie. the Mayflower Compact), and in recent times, we've had groups like the (original) Black Panthers, the Young Lords Party, Freedom Riders, UNIA, NAACP, La Raza, Young Patriots Party, the Yippies, etc.. that have continued the "radical" tradition. These groups were targeted and deemed domestic terroritsts due to their "leftists" views, and yet they are the same groups that gave minority/immigrant children a fair shot at a decent education, access to school breakfast and lunch programs, housing equality, and voter rights. These set the stage for allowing the children (and in some case parents) access to the "American Dream", further that, the opportunity to create LGLOs, to which the writer of these excerpts is a current member.

I will give it to LUL – their strategy is smart. Their chapters are like little liberal activist cells. They tap into the “cool” part of college by being greek and participating in traditional cultural events like stepping, strolling, and really neat jackets with numbers and line names. The insidious underbelly of it all is the radical agenda they unapologetically promote to their members and to the Latino community at large.

 As a member of a LGLO my organization, on a national level, is a neutral body. The actions of one sister or chapter DO NOT reflect the opinions or beliefs of the entire organization, and I am sure any member of LUL or any other LGLO will tell you the same. Her rhetoric here is very inflammatory, used no doubt to drum up fear and demean an organization based on the views of a specific chapter/region. Who are we to judge their fight? At least they're taking a cue from their founders and protesting against what they feel is an injustice.

I wonder – do you think such student organizations get school funding? Where I went to school the LUL chapter had access to funds from the school through various means and methods. I don’t know about you but I wouldn’t want my money going to such an organization. They may hold constructive events like tutoring and clothing drives once in a while – but it is impossible to overlook their political motives. [...] This has a huge impact. Among the Latino/a community and youth in general, America is a joke. To such well ordered organizations, assimilation is cultural betrayal. Instead, they teach our youth to rebel against the United States while simultaneously demanding funding and entitlements. Of course, they couple this with sneering anti-white rhetoric if white Americans don’t immediately kowtow to wildly unrealistic demands.

 Those school funds are now available to groups like LUL because many of our founders demanded an end to the sociological injustice. Fourty to thirty years ago there was NO funding for ethnic groups, let alone student aid of minority/immigrant students. As we speak many middle and high schools, and colleges and universities are electing to rid their system of ethnic studies, stripping American children the opportunity to learn the truth about their heritage and their country; to me that's un-American. If supporting ethnic diversity is a "waste of school funding" I would hate to know what her views are on schools that use student funds to pay star athletes' way through college, or athletic coache's six figure salaries, or pedophile faculty member to "teach" children in America's broken education system.

I agree that most of America's children are lost and feel a sense of entitlement, but bills like the Dream Act are not the enemy. The enemy is lack of cultural pride, the lack of access to equality, and the dangerous inflammatory rhetoric described in these excerpts. I believe everyone's road to greatness and equal opportunity is their own to tow, but to deny people "the pursuit of happiness" is wrong. The nations of the Americas were founded on rebellion; by those who realized a flawed system and demaded change, much like the foundation of LGLOs like LUL. What you call leftists, radical, etc... I call the spirit of the American dream.
I believe this person would have had a better chance at making a valid point, or creating a dialogue about the bill and systemic immigration reform, but using LUL as a pawn to make an example out of what she deems as leftist ideology because it doesn't fall in line with her definition of what it is to be American was a bad move.

My personal views about the Dream Act are not what's on trial here, but the blatantly putting another down to build yourself up is the exact "crabs in a barrel" mentality that keep us, children of the diaspora, continually separated, inflicting each other with self deprecating remarks.

The views expressed in this post are mine and in no way reflect that of my particular organization. I am always up for a stimulating political debate so feel free to comment! I leave you with my favorite MLK quote:

"An injustice anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere"